From: Frank Liang (liangfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 16:45:05 GMT-3
I have tried this network, it works fine without setting the lf. DLSW takes
care when it does the translation. It will be good practice to set lf 1500
when you use Ethernet interface to reduce DLSW processing overhead.
Frank
>From: Vikas Gupta <vicky_gupta1803@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Vikas Gupta <vicky_gupta1803@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: DLSW questions
>Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 07:51:43 -0800 (PST)
>
>Hello Group,
>
>Two questions on DLSW:
>
>1. Do I need to specify the largest frame size on my
>remote-peer statments when peering with routers having
>ethernet and TR attached workstations when I am using
>TCP encapsulation? If yes, do I specify on both
>remote-peer and local-peer or just remote-peer. I
>think that you only need on remote-peer on both sides.
>Pls correct me if I am wrong. If I am using promiscous
>on one side how would I set the LF on this side. This
>is basic network diagram..
>
>-----(e0) R1------IP Cloud------R2(TR)----
>
>2. Is there a link of DLSW design guide on the Doc CD?
> I have the link on CCO but could not find it on CD.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Vikas
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3