OSPF-->IGRP redistribution

From: Bill Young (byoung@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 22:05:25 GMT-3

• Next message: YJC: "Re: frame-relay traffic shape"
• Previous message: Piperw222@xxxxxxx: "BOOTCAMP LAB5 IPX SAP QUESTION"
• Next in thread: Lev Terebizh: "Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution"
• Maybe reply: Lev Terebizh: "Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution"
• Maybe reply: RAMIL>:-p: "Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hey all,

I hate to bring this discussion up again but I've been through the =
archives and I'm still not totally clear on the best way to handle this =
problem. The scenario is this (basically the "Advanced Redistribution" =
lab from fatkid.com):

      R1---------IGRP----------R2
       | /
      O / P
      S / R
      P / G
      F / I
      | /
     R4

All ip addressing is subnetted from the class C address 201.112.97.0. =
Behind R1 and R4 are more networks with RIP & EIGRP. All of that is =
working fine. The problem is redistributing /26 /27 & /28 routes into =
IGRP.

I have seen suggestions about putting a default-network in. I tried =
that but if that's the correct answer, I am doing something wrong. I =
can't directly use a static route, that would be cheating :-). =20

Thanks,
Bill

• Next message: YJC: "Re: frame-relay traffic shape"
• Previous message: Piperw222@xxxxxxx: "BOOTCAMP LAB5 IPX SAP QUESTION"
• Next in thread: Lev Terebizh: "Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution"
• Maybe reply: Lev Terebizh: "Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution"
• Maybe reply: RAMIL>:-p: "Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:02 GMT-3