From: RAMIL>:-p (ramil@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 15 2000 - 14:10:24 GMT-3
That would mean creating that external network/subnet.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lev Terebizh" <lter@rmconsulting.com>
To: "Bill Young" <byoung@cox.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution
> It is simple (when you know)... I fail my first attempt on this....
>
> In "default network" command you should use some external classful network
> that is not the same as that network you already use...
> For you case that mean ...
> You should have some redistributed to ospf network (for example
199.99.99.1)
> and when this network will come to router with OSPF-IGRP redistribution it
> shoud be made as default network for IGRP....
>
> That's it.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Young" <byoung@cox.rr.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 17:05
> Subject: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution
>
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I hate to bring this discussion up again but I've been through the =
> > archives and I'm still not totally clear on the best way to handle this
=
> > problem. The scenario is this (basically the "Advanced Redistribution"
=
> > lab from fatkid.com):
> >
> > R1---------IGRP----------R2
> > | /
> > O / P
> > S / R
> > P / G
> > F / I
> > | /
> > R4
> >
> >
> > All ip addressing is subnetted from the class C address 201.112.97.0. =
> > Behind R1 and R4 are more networks with RIP & EIGRP. All of that is =
> > working fine. The problem is redistributing /26 /27 & /28 routes into =
> > IGRP.
> >
> > I have seen suggestions about putting a default-network in. I tried =
> > that but if that's the correct answer, I am doing something wrong. I =
> > can't directly use a static route, that would be cheating :-). =20
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:03 GMT-3