From: Lev Terebizh (lter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 23:10:50 GMT-3
It is simple (when you know)... I fail my first attempt on this....
In "default network" command you should use some external classful network
that is not the same as that network you already use...
For you case that mean ...
You should have some redistributed to ospf network (for example 199.99.99.1)
and when this network will come to router with OSPF-IGRP redistribution it
shoud be made as default network for IGRP....
That's it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Young" <byoung@cox.rr.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 17:05
Subject: OSPF-->IGRP redistribution
> Hey all,
>
> I hate to bring this discussion up again but I've been through the =
> archives and I'm still not totally clear on the best way to handle this =
> problem. The scenario is this (basically the "Advanced Redistribution" =
> lab from fatkid.com):
>
> R1---------IGRP----------R2
> | /
> O / P
> S / R
> P / G
> F / I
> | /
> R4
>
>
> All ip addressing is subnetted from the class C address 201.112.97.0. =
> Behind R1 and R4 are more networks with RIP & EIGRP. All of that is =
> working fine. The problem is redistributing /26 /27 & /28 routes into =
> IGRP.
>
> I have seen suggestions about putting a default-network in. I tried =
> that but if that's the correct answer, I am doing something wrong. I =
> can't directly use a static route, that would be cheating :-). =20
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:02 GMT-3