From: Thounda Craig, Jr (hjcgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 10:40:59 GMT-3
Correction: Exclude IGRP from the comment, when speaking on IPX ONLY
(processes involved are only RIP and EIGRP).
brgds,
Thounda Craig
----- Original Message -----
From: Thounda Craig, Jr <hjcgroup@mindspring.com>
To: Sam Munzani <sam@chinet.com>; CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Redistribution EIGRP-IGRP does it require same AS to work?
> Sam,
>
> If you want to isolate your IP/IPX routing domains (EIGRP vs. IGRP), then
> simply make each AS (per router) different. As for Appletalk (EIGRP),
you
> have to assign unique AS #'s in order for routers to converge (see CCO for
> "EIGRP/Appletalk").
>
> brgds,
> Thounda Craig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Munzani <sam@chinet.com>
> To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail) <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:54 AM
> Subject: Redistribution EIGRP-IGRP does it require same AS to work?
>
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I know that EIGRP and IGRP does automatic redistribution between them.
How
> > exactly does it work? Do they need same AS in order to do automatic
> > redistribution? How can you avoid redistribution if that's the case.
> >
> > One the same token,
> > EIGRP uses same routing update packets for IP,IPX & APPLE routes. For
this
> > to happen do you have to use same AS for IP,IPX & APPLE? You can do it
> > easily with IP,IPX but when you use 2 routers with same AS for APPLE it
> > complains about that number being used.
> >
> > Please help me understand behaviour of these routing protocols.
> >
> > Sam Munzani
> > Lab: Sept 9-10 at San Jose
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:33 GMT-3