From: Thounda Craig, Jr (hjcgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 12:49:01 GMT-3
Their is a big problem with IPX RIP. Think about a single interface (NBMA)
learning & sending routes (spot the issue).
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Munzani <sam@chinet.com>
To: Clifton Stewart <cliftonlstewart@home.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: Redistribution EIGRP-IGRP does it require same AS to work?
> > automatically redistribute their routes. But be careful with IPX-RIP
> > there is a problem in NBMA environments; can you spot the issue?
>
> PIX-RIP again is a DV. So you have to worry about split-horizon.
>
> Sam
>
> >
> > -Cliff
> >
> > Sam Munzani wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Group,
> > >
> > > I know that EIGRP and IGRP does automatic redistribution between them.
How
> > > exactly does it work? Do they need same AS in order to do automatic
> > > redistribution? How can you avoid redistribution if that's the case.
> > >
> > > One the same token,
> > > EIGRP uses same routing update packets for IP,IPX & APPLE routes. For
this
> > > to happen do you have to use same AS for IP,IPX & APPLE? You can do it
> > > easily with IP,IPX but when you use 2 routers with same AS for APPLE
it
> > > complains about that number being used.
> > >
> > > Please help me understand behaviour of these routing protocols.
> > >
> > > Sam Munzani
> > > Lab: Sept 9-10 at San Jose
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:33 GMT-3