From: Niall (niallr@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 03 1999 - 16:56:55 GMT-3
Caslow's book gives a reasonable explanation of when you would want to use LANE
.
Specifically, whenever you want to run more than IP over the ATM network. I'm
getting some good hands-on time at work doing this on 10 5500s :-) I've also
been reading Berry Kercheval's TCP/IP over ATM (ISBN 0-13-768599-8). It has
helped me get a MUCH better grip on how some of this stuff works.
In the lab we won't have to config the switches, just the edge devices like the
Catalysts. At least that is my understanding.
Niall
Ben Rife wrote:
> 10 days left !!!
>
> Scott and other list members,
>
> I appreciate your response to my ATM questions about a week ago. I need
> to discuss something else with you though, if you have time.
>
> Looking through the doc cd and cco, I have found examples for configuring an
> ATM PVC between 2 routers, through a switch. The config of the interface is
> as follows (similar at both ends):
>
> ROUTER:
>
> interface atm 0
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> atm rate-queue 1 100
> atm pvc 5 0 10 aal5snap
> map-group atm
> !
> map-list atm
> ip 1.1.1.5 atm-vc 5 broadcast
>
> This doesn't appear to be using LANE, can you explain why? When and why do I
> need LANE? This config is very simple. Even the switch config is simple.
>
> As for the CCIE Lab, cco says that with respect to ATM, we will not have to
> configure a switch at this time. Does this mean that we won't be using LANE
> in the lab?
>
> Thanks everyone, have a happy and safe 4th,
>
> Benjy Rife
> MCSE, CNE, CCIE Candidate
> brife@bignet.net
> www.bignet.net/~brife
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:41 GMT-3