Re: basic multicast query

Akhilish ...

i am receiving traffic without doing any thing ...no need for IGMP
snooping as you said..

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:57 AM, AKHILESH <akhi_thakur_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Imran,
> If both the server and client are on the same vlan, the multicast traffic
> from server will reach client without doing anything. Ofcourse this will
> lead to lot of braodcast in switched network.
> One way to reduce is to use IGMP snooping where switches will find out
> where the interested clients are and only forward on those ports.
> Remember there is no need of S,G when client and server are in same vlan
> and router has very limited role.
>
> Regards
> Akhilesh
>
> > CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > From: anthonybonilla.ccie_at_gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: basic multicast query
> > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:24:16 -0500
> > To: immrccie_at_gmail.com
>
> >
> > Wouldn't IGMP snooping take care of it by itself?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Jan 2, 2014, at 12:00 AM, Imran Ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi team ,
> > >
> > > if we have multicast clients and server on same vlan , the set up is
> > > going to work ? without using.
> > > advance config like MVR ?
> > >
> > > i know we can use broadcast , but the app is tuned to send muticast
> > > traffic . .
> > >
> > > will the tree S,G can receive on same SVI and flood it back to same
> > > vlan ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jan 02 2014 - 12:40:49 ART