Re: What does 'show ip eigrp topology x.x.x.x/x' actually show?

From: <dia.aliou_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:05:36 -0700

Sorry I didnt check well, had some variance and delay configs.

On 10 August 2012 00:39, Keller Giacomarro <keller.g_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Good thought on variance, but I do not have it configured.
>
> R3(config-router)#do show ver | inc 12.4
> Cisco IOS Software, C2600 Software (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version
> 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
> R3(config-router)#do show run | inc variance
> R3(config-router)#
>
> I'm also pretty sure it's not an artifact from my setup, as the output
> I pasted was directly out of the solution guide!
>
> Keller Giacomarro
> keller.g_at_gmail.com
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:35 AM, dia.aliou_at_gmail.com
> <dia.aliou_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Keller,
> > Which IOS version are you using?
> > Just tested in 12.4T, I only see feasible successor when I use the below
> > command.
> > I would guess you have variance configured under eigrp.
> >
> > /Aliou
> >
> > On 10 August 2012 00:07, Keller Giacomarro <keller.g_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay, pretty stumped here.
> >>
> >> R3#show ip eigrp topology 150.1.7.0 255.255.255.0
> >> IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 150.1.7.0/24
> >> State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 128256
> >> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >> 155.1.37.7 (FastEthernet0/0), from 155.1.37.7, Send flag is 0x0
> >> Composite metric is (128256/128000), Route is Internal
> >> Vector metric:
> >> Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
> >> Total delay is 5010 microseconds
> >> Reliability is 255/255
> >> Load is 1/255
> >> Minimum MTU is 1500
> >> Hop count is 1
> >> 155.1.0.5 (Serial1/0.1), from 155.1.0.5, Send flag is 0x0
> >> Composite metric is (1152512/640512), Route is Internal
> >> Vector metric:
> >> Minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit
> >> Total delay is 45020 microseconds
> >> Reliability is 255/255
> >> Load is 1/255
> >>
> >> I thought that 'show ip eigrp topo x.x.x.x/x' showed successors and
> >> feasible successors only. But the second entry above shows an AD of
> >> 640512, which is larger than the FD of 128256. Is this considered a
> >> Feasible Successor or not? If not, what's it doing in this command
> >> output?
> >>
> >> Thanks as always!
> >>
> >> Keller Giacomarro
> >> keller.g_at_gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Aug 10 2012 - 01:05:36 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Sep 01 2012 - 08:41:18 ART