Marko,
I disagree with you the question was very vague, you said you
understood I asked you to clarify and you could not, finally, Don
explained to me what his original intent was. But you answer that you
understood his requirements, and I asked you state what he was asking
and you could not provide.
I prove you wrong again in other post VTP version 3 can be on exam,
you said its not on exam, I asked you to provide reference you could
not.
Here is original question:
Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
Thanks.
R2#show run | sec rip
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
distribute-list prefix 1 in FastEthernet0/0
no auto-summary
R2#show run | sec prefix-list
ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
R2#show ip route rip
R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
if I am using a standard ACL
Standard ACL
R2#show run | sec rip
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
distribute-list 1 in FastEthernet0/0
no auto-summary
R2#show run | sec access-list
access-list 1 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.0
R2#show ip ro rip
R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
193.1.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 193.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
194.1.1.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 194.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
Please try to be nice and friendly im here to help the team.
Regards,
John
On 6/25/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> Below original question was output from various commands you didn't
> bother to look at.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, john matijevic
> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Marc,
>>
>> I will repost original question and please identify in what way I was
>> argumentitive or rude.
>>
>> {
>> Good Afternoon,
>>
>> "Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
>> Thanks."
>>
>> What is this?
>>
>> Very vague, can you please be more specific and describe exactly the
>> issue or problem that you are trying to solve?
>>
>> Please post network diagram and configurations.
>> }
>>
>> Please try and be professional we are here to help not to be rude.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>> On 6/25/12, Ronnie Angello <ronnie.angello_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Don't mess with Marko! That's my brother from another mother...
>>>
>>> http://t.co/ggHcHwFO
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:47 AM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here you are again arguing (and being very rude) to a CCIE again (Marko
>>>> is
>>>> actually a 2X CCIE). The only reason you find the question vague is
>>>> because
>>>> you lack the knowledge to understand the question. Marko was taking the
>>>> time to try to explain it and more detail to you and you act ungrateful
>>>> and
>>>> tell him to think before he responds.
>>>>
>>>> You should probably consider going to a CCNP study group until you have
>>>> a
>>>> stronger foundation to discuss these topics, or at the very least learn
>>>> to
>>>> be respectful and admit that it is YOU that needs more explanation and
>>>> to
>>>> ask for it nicely.
>>>>
>>>> -Marc Abel
>>>> CCIE #35470
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:50 PM, john matijevic
>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Marko,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hasse was very vague with his question, since you understood what his
>>>>> question is I asked you to state it. Then Hasse responded with
>>>>> clarification.
>>>>> Please think before you respond.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/24/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>>>> He's asking can he filter a specific prefix using an extended access
>>>>>> list, instead of using a prefix list. He gives an example where he
>>>>>> tried with a prefix-list and the example where he tried an acl, with
>>>>>> obviously different results. Someone very quickly pointed out the
>>>>>> difference, with the link to the Cisco's and INE's blog describing
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> particular use-case. Case closed, moving on. Don't overthink the
>>>>>> questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:29 PM, john matijevic
>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Good Afternoon Marko,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please enlighten us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the question:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please clarify what this is? I don't understand what he is asking?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> He did post the config snippets. I think the question was very
>>>>>>>> clear.
>>>>>>>> So were the answers :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:27 PM, john matijevic
>>>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Good Afternoon,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
>>>>>>>>> Thanks."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Very vague, can you please be more specific and describe exactly
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> issue or problem that you are trying to solve?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please post network diagram and configurations.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Sarad <tosara_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hasse,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We can use a extended access-list in BGP to replace a
>>>>>>>>>> prefix-list,
>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> IGP it appears differently as extended accesslist represent the
>>>>>>>>>> route
>>>>>>>>>> source and subnet (not subnet and subnet mask)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/01/04/using-extended-access-lists-in-a-distribute-list/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>> Sara
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, <daniel.dib_at_reaper.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hasse,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are trying to match every class C address with /24 mask
>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> not possible with a standard ACL. If you used extended ACL you
>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>> mask like this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> access-list 100 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 host
>>>>>>>>>>> 255.255.255.0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> However I think this is only supported in BGP.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:02:01 +0200, Hasse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain
>>>>>>>>>>>> Freeze
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>>>>>>>>>>>> router rip
>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute-list prefix 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> no auto-summary
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec prefix-list
>>>>>>>>>>>> ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show ip route rip
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> if I am using a standard ACL
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard ACL
>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>>>>>>>>>>>> router rip
>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute-list 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> no auto-summary
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec access-list
>>>>>>>>>>>> access-list 1 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show ip ro rip
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> 193.1.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 193.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>> 194.1.1.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>>>>>>>>>> R 194.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>>>>>>>>>> ___________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>>>>>>>>> ___________
>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>>>>>>>>>>> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marc Abel
>>>> CCIE #35470
>>>> (Routing and Switching)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jun 25 2012 - 13:20:33 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 01 2012 - 10:39:52 ART