Re: prefix and acl

I will be professional by not writing what I want to write.

Please, try not to interact with me. I *really* don't have time for
you any more. I'm here to help, but when people flat-out *refuse*
help, I'm just wasting my time.

Again, please, refrain from interacting with me if you can.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:31 PM, john matijevic
<john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Marko,
>
> You did not clarify, Don clarified the question.
> VTP3 can be tested on the lab from the Cisco documentation website
> that I provided links to on other post.
> I go from what Cisco says and what is documented. I have yet to see
> where you get the information to suggest that Version 3 cannot be
> asked.
> "
>> I will repeat once again that VTPv3 is not supported on the release of
>> the software in the lab. It's up to you to either accept or not accept
>> that.
> "
>
> Where is this documented?
>
> Again, you should and i'll repeat again think before you speak, and
> addiitonally please try and be professional.
>
> Until you can prove me wrong I have to go with what is documented on
> Cisco's website as to the topics and software images on the Lab.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
> On 6/25/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, the question was can the ACL be used instead of a prefix-list to
>> accomplish the same result. We clarified that and that question was
>> answered...
>>
>> I will repeat once again that VTPv3 is not supported on the release of
>> the software in the lab. It's up to you to either accept or not accept
>> that.
>>
>> Personally, I've had just about enough of arguing with you. Please,
>> bother someone else. Or even better... spend time learning something
>> so you can pass CCIE again.
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:20 PM, john matijevic
>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Marko,
>>>
>>> I disagree with you the question was very vague, you said you
>>> understood I asked you to clarify and you could not, finally, B Don
>>> explained to me what his original intent was. But you answer that you
>>> understood his requirements, and I asked you state what he was asking
>>> and you could not provide.
>>>
>>> I prove you wrong again in other post VTP version 3 can be on exam,
>>> you said its not on exam, I asked you to provide reference you could
>>> not.
>>>
>>> Here is original question:
>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>>> router rip
>>> B version 2
>>> B network 10.0.0.0
>>> B distribute-list prefix 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>>> B no auto-summary
>>>
>>> R2#show run | sec prefix-list
>>> ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
>>>
>>> R2#show ip route rip
>>> R B  B 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>>> R B  B 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>>> R B  B 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>>> R B  B 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>>>
>>> if I am using a standard ACL
>>>
>>>
>>> Standard ACL
>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>>> router rip
>>> B version 2
>>> B network 10.0.0.0
>>> B distribute-list 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>>> B no auto-summary
>>>
>>> R2#show run | sec access-list
>>> access-list 1 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.0
>>>
>>> R2#show ip ro rip
>>> R B  B 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>>> R B  B 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>>> B  B 193.1.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>> R B  B  B  193.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>>> R B  B 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>>> R B  B 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>>> B  B 194.1.1.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>> R B  B  B  194.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>>>
>>>
>>> Please try to be nice and friendly im here to help the team.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>> On 6/25/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>> Below original question was output from various commands you didn't
>>>> bother to look at.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, john matijevic
>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Marc,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will repost original question and please identify in what way I was
>>>>> argumentitive or rude.
>>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>> Good Afternoon,
>>>>>
>>>>> "Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
>>>>> Thanks."
>>>>>
>>>>> What is this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Very vague, can you please be more specific and describe exactly the
>>>>> issue or problem that you are trying to solve?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please post network diagram and configurations.
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try and be professional we are here to help not to be rude.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/25/12, Ronnie Angello <ronnie.angello_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Don't mess with Marko! B That's my brother from another mother...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://t.co/ggHcHwFO
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:47 AM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here you are again arguing (and being very rude) to a CCIE again
>>>>>>> (Marko
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> actually a 2X CCIE). The only reason you find the question vague is
>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>> you lack the knowledge to understand the question. Marko was taking
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> time to try to explain it and more detail to you and you act
>>>>>>> ungrateful
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> tell him to think before he responds.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You should probably consider going to a CCNP study group until you
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> stronger foundation to discuss these topics, or at the very least
>>>>>>> learn
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be respectful and admit that it is YOU that needs more explanation
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> ask for it nicely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marc Abel
>>>>>>> CCIE #35470
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:50 PM, john matijevic
>>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Marko,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hasse was very vague with his question, since you understood what
>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>> question is I asked you to state it. Then Hasse responded with
>>>>>>>> clarification.
>>>>>>>> Please think before you respond.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> He's asking can he filter a specific prefix using an extended
>>>>>>>>> access
>>>>>>>>> list, instead of using a prefix list. He gives an example where he
>>>>>>>>> tried with a prefix-list and the example where he tried an acl,
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> obviously different results. Someone very quickly pointed out the
>>>>>>>>> difference, with the link to the Cisco's and INE's blog describing
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> particular use-case. Case closed, moving on. Don't overthink the
>>>>>>>>> questions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>>>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:29 PM, john matijevic
>>>>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Good Afternoon Marko,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please enlighten us.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is the question:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please clarify what this is? I don't understand what he is asking?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> He did post the config snippets. I think the question was very
>>>>>>>>>>> clear.
>>>>>>>>>>> So were the answers :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>>>>>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:27 PM, john matijevic
>>>>>>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Good Afternoon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain
>>>>>>>>>>>> Freeze
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What is this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Very vague, can you please be more specific and describe exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue or problem that you are trying to solve?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please post network diagram and configurations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Sarad <tosara_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hasse,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can use a extended access-list in BGP to replace a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefix-list,
>>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGP it appears differently as extended accesslist represent the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> route
>>>>>>>>>>>>> source and subnet (not subnet and subnet mask)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/01/04/using-extended-access-lists-in-a-distribute-list/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sara
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, <daniel.dib_at_reaper.nu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hasse,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are trying to match every class C address with /24 mask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not possible with a standard ACL. If you used extended ACL you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mask like this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access-list 100 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 host
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 255.255.255.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I think this is only supported in BGP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:02:01 +0200, Hasse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freeze
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router rip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute-list prefix 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no auto-summary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec prefix-list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show ip route rip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I am using a standard ACL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard ACL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> router rip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute-list 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no auto-summary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec access-list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access-list 1 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show ip ro rip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B  B 193.1.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B  B  193.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B  B 194.1.1.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> R B  B  B  194.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ___________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ___________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Marc Abel
>>>>>>> CCIE #35470
>>>>>>> (Routing and Switching)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net