Re: Peer Neighbor Route

There is a virtual link from r3 to area 0. What I don't understand is the peer
nei route.

Vincent Tay

On 30 May, 2012, at 12:04 AM, oo IPX <oispxl_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> You can't have two non-zero areas communicate together.
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Vincent Tay <vtay.75_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some issue with peer neighbor route.
>
> Network Setup
> EIGRP Domain
> ________________________
> |
> |
> |
> |
> OSPF 2 | OSPF 1 |
> R4 ------------PPPoE-----------------R3-------------------------------R2
>
>
> R3 has three routes as below once the PPPoE has been setup.
>
> C 5.5.34.3/32 is directly connected, Dialer1
> O 5.5.34.0/24 [110/1786] via 5.5.34.4, 00:14:17
> C 5.5.34.4/32 is directly connected, Dialer1
>
> However on R2, it has only two routes as below.
>
> O IA 5.5.34.3/32 [110/1849] via 5.5.23.3, 00:14:13, Serial0/1
> O IA 5.5.34.0/24 [110/1850] via 5.5.23.3, 00:14:13, Serial0/1
>
> The ospf network statement is correct using "network 5.5.34.0 0.0.0.255
> area 2" on R3. My question is what happen to 5.5.34.4 route. It should
> appear in R2 as interarea routes right. Another question is once i perform
> mutual redistribution on R3 and R2, i receive 5.5.34.4/32 as external
> routes. Puzzled.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 30 2012 - 20:41:24 ART