RE: Route-map Set interface behavior

That's it, thanks a bunch.

From: aaron1_at_gvtc.com
To: kapilatrish_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Route-map Set interface behavior
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:01:57 -0600

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6599/products_white_paper09186a00800a44
09.shtml#wp14045

1. List of interfaces through which the packets can be routedIf more than one
interface is specified, then the first interface that is found to be up will
be used for forwarding the packets.

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Kapil
Atrish
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:50 PM
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Route-map Set interface behavior

Hi,

Question:
With the below configuration, how will traffic with source address 10.8.81.x
routed? Will it use Tunnel8101 and Tunnel8201 alternatively? Or it will only
use Tunnel8101 as long as it's up and if it goes down, it'll fail over to
Tunnel8201?

ip access-list extended VoIP_Out
permit ip 10.8.81.0 0.0.0.255 any
!
route-map NTH48 permit 10
match ip address VoIP_Out
set interface Tunnel8101 Tunnel8201
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
ip address 101.81.12.41 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map NTH48
!

Thanks,
Kapil

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jan 26 2012 - 17:02:06 ART