Thanks guys for your responses, it makes perfect sense what you are saying.
It is the restrictions they would give you in the beginning where they
might say not to change any configured IP addressing, which technically
link-local could be considered as part of that, which concerns me.
Thanks
Tom
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Steve Di Bias <sdibias_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Tom!
>
> Unless the CCIE lab prohibits it I would at least do it on your frame
> relay interfaces, it's going to make your life a whole lot easier if you
> do. Another thing to think about is a regrade, what will happen if you
> mapped the dynamically generated link-local address and they loaded
> your configs onto some OTHER rack? Will your frame maps survive? Probably
> not!
>
> In the end do you what you are comfortable with and that isn't restricted.
> Happy Labbing!
>
> Steve
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Just a quick general question. In most of the solutions provided in
>> Solution Guide of labs I'm using, the IPv6 link-local address of serial
>> interfaces is changed to something like Fe80::1 for R1, FE80::2 for R1
>> etc.
>> Is that something that would be allowed in the lab or is that just shown
>> to
>> make the solution easier to understand? I'm curious as I always mess up on
>> the FR mapping for those and it would make life a lot easier if I could
>> just change it to something easier.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for responses.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Steve Di Bias
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 30 2011 - 22:53:41 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 01 2012 - 08:27:00 ART