Re: BGP neighborship problem

Yes i know there is just a default route . THis is a EBGP peer and i know i
can ping the other ends loopback with my loopback but i cant form
neighborship
Is there any logic for this ? Is this a inherent BGP behaviour or it is
just a TCP implementation .

Can someone give me the reason why BGP is not taking the default route

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:13 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> R1(config)#do sh debug
> IP routing:
> BGP debugging is on for address family: IPv4 Unicast
>
> R1(config)#
> *Mar 1 01:57:08.247: BGP: 2.2.2.2 active open failed - no route to
> peer, open active delayed 29174ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter)
>
> R1(config)#do sh ip route 2.2.2.2
> % Network not in table
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..." - RFC 1925
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:08 PM, CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi fellas,
> >
> > I have a simple topology R1----------------------------R2 R1 is
> > forming neighbourship with R2's loopback and viceversa. I have a default
> > route configured to reach loopback.
> > Why BGP cant form a neighbourship with a peer with a default route? Why
> it
> > needs a unicast exact route to form a peer?
> > What is the logic behind this ? Can anyone explain me the logic?
> >
> > --
> > With Warmest Regards,
> >
> > CCIE KID
> > CCIE#29992 (Security)
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

-- 
With Warmest Regards,
CCIE KID
IN PURSUIT OF CCIE
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net