Re: BGP neighborship problem

From: garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:01:23 +0300

"To avoid the accidental creation of loops through oscillating routes,
the multihop session will not be established if the only route to the
multihop peer's address is the default route (0.0.0.0). "

neighbor {ip-address | peer-group-name} ebgp-multihop

Allow BGP sessions, even when the neighbor is not on a directly
connected segment. The multihop session is not established if the only
route to the multi-hop peer's address is the default route (0.0.0.0).

--
Garry L. Baker
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..." - RFC 1925
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:49 PM, CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes i know there is just a default route . THis is a EBGP peer and i know i
> can ping the other ends loopback with my loopback but i cant form
> neighborship
> Is there any logic for this ?  Is this a inherent BGP behaviour or it is
> just a TCP implementation .
>
> Can someone give me the reason why BGP is not taking the default route
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:13 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> R1(config)#do sh debug
>> IP routing:
>>  BGP debugging is on for address family: IPv4 Unicast
>>
>> R1(config)#
>> *Mar  1 01:57:08.247: BGP: 2.2.2.2 active open failed - no route to
>> peer, open active delayed 29174ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter)
>>
>> R1(config)#do sh ip route 2.2.2.2
>> % Network not in table
>>
>> --
>> Garry L. Baker
>>
>> "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine..." - RFC 1925
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:08 PM, CCIE KID <eliteccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi fellas,
>> >
>> > I have a simple topology R1----------------------------R2        R1 is
>> > forming neighbourship with R2's loopback  and viceversa. I have a
>> > default
>> > route configured to reach loopback.
>> > Why BGP cant form a neighbourship  with a peer with a default route? Why
>> > it
>> > needs a unicast exact route to form a peer?
>> > What is the logic behind this ? Can anyone explain me the logic?
>> >
>> > --
>> > With Warmest Regards,
>> >
>> > CCIE KID
>> > CCIE#29992 (Security)
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
> --
> With Warmest Regards,
>
> CCIE KID
> IN PURSUIT OF CCIE
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Oct 15 2011 - 21:01:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2011 - 13:10:29 ART