RE: OSPF Neighborship

From: Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:42:26 +0300

That means that R2 will get the default route from R3 and vice versa through R1

From: robclav_at_gmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:39:54 +0200
Subject: Re: OSPF Neighborship
To: go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com
CC: manouchehr1979_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com

you couldn't filter intraarea. So creating the default at both routers, and playing with point-to-point and p-2-multipoint.Any additional restriction? That solution should work...

2011/10/4 Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com>

all the routers are in area 0

From: robclav_at_gmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:33:01 +0200
Subject: Re: OSPF Neighborship

To: go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com
CC: manouchehr1979_at_gmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com

Stub area? then establishing default-metric to modify the metric for the selfinjected default route?

2011/10/4 Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com>

I'd like R2 and R3 to inject only default route with different metric to R1 to work as Active/Standby

but don't like R2 or R3 to get the default route of each other so i asked to prevent the neighborship between R2 and R3 Does that work ?

Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 05:20:51 -0500

Subject: Re: OSPF Neighborship

From: manouchehr1979_at_gmail.com

To: go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com

CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com

Use NBMA network type.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

I have 3 routers in the same subnet (same Switch) and I'd like R1 to make neighborship with R2 and R3 only

in other words R2 and R3 can't establish any neighborship

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 04 2011 - 13:42:26 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2011 - 13:10:29 ART