Re: OSPF Neighborship

From: Roberto Clavero <robclav_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:15:33 +0200

What about, my last solutions using cond adv at R1. And R2 and R3 sending
regular defaults?

2011/10/4 Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com>

> But R2 and R3 will still receive the default route of each other through R1
> and that not acceptable
>
> > CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > From: kgabo.seopa_at_gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: OSPF Neighborship
> > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:02:50 +0200
> > To: go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com
> >
> > Make both R2 and R3 to have priority zero. As such, they won't
> participate on the DR/BDR process and won't form full neighbor relationship.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Kgabo Seopa
> > CCIE#30089
> >
> > On 04 Oct 2011, at 12:12, Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have 3 routers in the same subnet (same Switch) and I'd like R1 to
> make neighborship with R2 and R3 only
> > > in other words R2 and R3 can't establish any neighborship
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Robert Clavero
CCIE RS/wr, CCNP, CCSP, CCSE NGX, SCSA 9, WLFES, BNP y JNCIA WX
blog:http://robclavbcn.blogspot.com
 web:http://www.kubsolutions.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 04 2011 - 13:15:33 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2011 - 13:10:29 ART