RE: How would you solve this task?

On mo, aug 08, 2011 at 23:11:14, Scott Morris wrote:
> Subject: Re: How would you solve this task?
>
> Two things...
>
> 1. The ASET lab may have been written before your solution (very
> good, by the way) was introduced in IOS being used in the lab!
>
> 2. They don't appear to care about success, just the attempts which
> may signify more generic approach like they did.
>
> Definitely not as elegant, but may be what's being asked for!
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
> #4713,
>
> CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP, et al.
>
> CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> swm_at_emanon.com
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>

Wow, thanks for all the replies guys. I really appreciate it. Rereading the
task I do see why I probably should have gone with the SG solution. They are
trying to mess with us with the "successful or not" statement. This is
exactly why I'm using these labs to get a feel for the wording and the large
topologys in the ASET lab.

There was also another task like this:

1.10 TROUBLE TICKET 10
R1's routing table has a summary pointing to Null0. Modify R1 so that there
are no routes to Null0.

SG solution: Turn off auto-summary under EIGRP.

My solution: Announce summary with AD of 255 on Ethernet interface which
meant it is not installed locally.

Also one of those tasks that could easily get misinterpreted.

Once again, thanks for your input.

/Daniel

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Aug 09 2011 - 06:42:28 ART