Re: virtual link authentication

Thanks for clarifying Marko.

-Hammer-

On 06/29/2011 02:15 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> No, it shouldn't. Virtual-link is an interface in area 0 and transit
> area authentication does not apply to it.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:12, Nathan Falcon<nathan.falcon_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please someone clear my head on this one....
>>
>> OK, so I've always considered a virtual-link to be part of the the backbone
>> area. B But now, I've seen some labs that appear to be contradicting each
>> other when it comes to authentication.
>>
>> I understand that if a question states that Area 0 requires authentication,
>> a virtual-link would need to be authenticated. B But what if the transit area
>> requires authentication and Area 0 doesn't? B Would the virtual-link need to
>> be authenticated? B My first though would be no since I consider a
>> virtual-link to actually be Area 0.....
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 29 2011 - 14:27:10 ART