Re: virtual link authentication

From: -Hammer- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:16:20 -0500

I understand the question but honestly am not sure. Logically I'm
thinking that the virtual link would NOT need authen even if the transit
does. If no one answers this for you, I will mock it up tonight and get
back with you.

-Hammer-

On 06/29/2011 02:12 PM, Nathan Falcon wrote:
> Please someone clear my head on this one....
>
> OK, so I've always considered a virtual-link to be part of the the backbone
> area. But now, I've seen some labs that appear to be contradicting each
> other when it comes to authentication.
>
> I understand that if a question states that Area 0 requires authentication,
> a virtual-link would need to be authenticated. But what if the transit area
> requires authentication and Area 0 doesn't? Would the virtual-link need to
> be authenticated? My first though would be no since I consider a
> virtual-link to actually be Area 0.....
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 29 2011 - 14:16:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 01 2011 - 06:24:28 ART