Re: frame-relay encapsulation mismatch

Looks like they both still have kmills type cisco even though ietf was
configured on R3
On Jun 18, 2011 8:14 AM, "imran ali" <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> if the encapsulation dosent match on between two frame-realy router doest
it
> logical to think circuit will break ?
>
> R1#show frame-relay map
> Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.3 dlci 103(0x67,0x1870), static,
> broadcast,
> CISCO, status defined, active
>
> R3#sh frame-relay map
> Serial0/1 (up): ip 10.0.0.1 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), static,
> broadcast,
> IETF, status defined, active
> CISCO, status defined, active
>
> R1#ping 10.0.0.3
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/51/80 ms
> R1#
>
> both are connected and reachable .....yet their is mismatch in
encapsulatin
> type ...
>
>
> why ?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 18 2011 - 09:09:37 ART