Re: frame-relay encapsulation mismatch

some one please lab this up on real gear ......this set up was on gns

my logic says encap mismatch should result in packet drop ...on end
devices....

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:09 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks like they both still have kmills type cisco even though ietf was
> configured on R3
> On Jun 18, 2011 8:14 AM, "imran ali" <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear all
> >
> > if the encapsulation dosent match on between two frame-realy router doest
> it
> > logical to think circuit will break ?
> >
> > R1#show frame-relay map
> > Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.3 dlci 103(0x67,0x1870), static,
> > broadcast,
> > CISCO, status defined, active
> >
> > R3#sh frame-relay map
> > Serial0/1 (up): ip 10.0.0.1 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), static,
> > broadcast,
> > IETF, status defined, active
> > CISCO, status defined, active
> >
> > R1#ping 10.0.0.3
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > !!!!!
> > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/51/80 ms
> > R1#
> >
> > both are connected and reachable .....yet their is mismatch in
> encapsulatin
> > type ...
> >
> >
> > why ?
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 18 2011 - 20:02:14 ART