Re: PIM-SM (Bootstrap Protocol vs Aotu-RP

thanks Garry

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:17 PM, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> BSR uses 224.0.0.13 for BSR announcements (from BSR to all pim routers) and
> unicast for RP announcements (from RP to BSR router).
>
>
> --
> Garry L. Baker
>
> "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Mark_1982 <m.abghany_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi there
>> i was going through the mini senarios and found that the bootstrap
>> protocol
>> doesnt need any mechanism to probagate the election results of the RP to
>> the
>> rest of the multicast domain like the case of auto-RP, for auto-RP u need
>> to
>> use either ip pim autorp listener or use sparse dense mode, but here all u
>> need is let R3 works as C-RP and C-BSR, can any one help me on this
>>
>> the topology is as shown below:
>>
>> Host1-R1-R2-R3-R4-R5-Host2
>>
>> u can check the topology on the following
>> http://ccie18473.net/dynamips/dynamips.htm#pim-sm-bsr
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Dec 10 2010 - 22:08:27 ART