RE: How to COMPLETE the END - TO - END LSP btw non-directly

Thanks Scott for your reply !
well I have done that at the first place and the problem is that the BGP
send-label is working fine between the R6 and R9 , where R6 is generating the
Labels for the prefixes, its the other side making troubles for God knows what
reason R2 and R6 are not building up the LSP between them !!

I have tried every possible thing and the LSP will not be UP !!!
IS this a CISCO BUG ?
I might be sounding wrong but with so many efforts i seem to lost it !!

> From: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> To: s_asfar_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com; pearlgaurav_at_gmail.com
> Subject: RE: How to COMPLETE the END - TO - END LSP btw non-directly
conncedted ASBR's in InterAS-VPN??? PLEASE Suggest ???
> Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 13:46:09 -0500
>
> On R6 and R9 you need to make sure you do "no bgp default route-target
> filter"
>
>
>
> For the recursive problem you need to make sure you are not announcing your
> tunnel sources thru the tunnel. That is basic recursive lookup problem
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>
> Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Asfer Shah [mailto:s_asfar_at_hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 12:18 AM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com; pearlgaurav_at_gmail.com; tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> Subject: RE: How to COMPLETE the END - TO - END LSP btw non-directly
> conncedted ASBR's in InterAS-VPN??? PLEASE Suggest ???
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear All,
> > I have tried my luck but I am forced to drop the below scnerio in whcih
we
> > have inter-as VPN but the ASBR's are not directly connected ?
> > Can any one help , I am having my brains lost with this scenerio ?
> >
> > R8---------R9-----------------R6--------------------R2
> > | |
> |
> > | |
> |
> > | |
> |
> > | |
> |
> > R4 R5 R3
> >
> > R8 and R9 are both in same AS 789 and are Mp-BGP neighbors.
> > R8 and R4 are PE-CE in vrf ABC-1 & R9 and R5 as PE-CE as ABC-2
> > R6 is in AS66 and its ipv4 ebgp peered with R9 and R2.
> >
> > R4 and R5 can reach each other routes since the LSP is complete.
> >
> > We have another AS22 on R2 with R3 as in vrf ABC-3.
> > R2 is MP-BGP Vpnv4 peered with R8. R3 can see the routes in its routing
> table
> > for both the cites ABC-1 and ABC-2 from R4 and R5 vice versa.
> > But when tried to ping , there is a failure because of the incomplete
LSP.
> > The problem is to complete the LSP between the R2 and its Vpnv4 ebgp peer
> R8.
> >
> > *I tried runnin LDP between R6-R9 and R6-R2 but no use since there is no
> > IGP btw R9/R6/R2 so that LDP cannot generate the labels for the
end-to-end
> > LSP
> >
> > *I tried running BGP labels by mentioning the BGP send-label to the ipv4
> > ebgp neibors R6-R2 and R6-R9 but the EBGP VPNv4 peering btw R2 & R8
> break
> > when I do this ?
> >
> >* I even tried configuring GRE Tunnel between R2 and R8 and ran MPLS on it
> , but the tunnel comes up and then goes down after 10 secs, message comes
> saying
> > tunnel turned down because o recursive lookup.
>
> >
> > Waiting for the experts FEEDBACK :)
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Dec 05 2010 - 05:21:12 ART