Re: OT:GETVPN Enquiry KS

Hi,

That's correct.

Regards.

On 22 Nov 2010 18:25, "karim jamali" <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Gents,

I have a real world implementation regarding GET VPN & I would need some
expertise help to confirm what I believe I understood. In a GET VPN
scenario, the KS only provide KS functionality, i.e. the KS itself cannot be
a GM subscribed to the KS and thus we have to dedicate one router or maybe
two for redundancy for KS functionality apart from all the other routers as
GM. Is this correct? Please if it is not I would appreciate if you will
correct me.

Thanks

Regards,

--
KJ
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net