That is what I understood as well. Once in the past, I tried to use the KS
as GM but it didn't work to me
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Dear Gents,
>
> I have a real world implementation regarding GET VPN & I would need some
> expertise help to confirm what I believe I understood. In a GET VPN
> scenario, the KS only provide KS functionality, i.e. the KS itself cannot be
> a GM subscribed to the KS and thus we have to dedicate one router or maybe
> two for redundancy for KS functionality apart from all the other routers as
> GM. Is this correct? Please if it is not I would appreciate if you will
> correct me.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards,
> --
> KJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
-- Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope) Cisco Security Professional Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Nov 22 2010 - 15:35:25 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 05 2010 - 22:14:56 ART