Re: OT:GETVPN Enquiry KS

Hi Karim,

Thats correct. I believe if its a KS (KS1), then a router can only be a GM
if it subscribes to another KS (KS2). KS1 and KS2 can be running coop if you
want to.

Someone correct me if I'm off target please.

Sadiq

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:24 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear Gents,
>
> I have a real world implementation regarding GET VPN & I would need some
> expertise help to confirm what I believe I understood. In a GET VPN
> scenario, the KS only provide KS functionality, i.e. the KS itself cannot
> be
> a GM subscribed to the KS and thus we have to dedicate one router or maybe
> two for redundancy for KS functionality apart from all the other routers as
> GM. Is this correct? Please if it is not I would appreciate if you will
> correct me.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards,
> --
> KJ
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
CCIEx2 (R&S|Sec) #19963
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net