Re: Inverse-ARP with no LMI

From: garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:58:23 -0500

i think that makes sense, in the fact that lmi is used to learn about the
dlci and then once you have the dlci either via lmi or static mapping then
inverse-arp can do its job

like you are saying if you start to mix and match all over the place you are
going to see 'strange' behaviors from the router not having all the
information it needs to get started

because what is it, inverse-arp is used to stop sending requests, but the
router will always respond to requests it receives right?

always a confusing topic for me, cause when we do it in the real world it is
always just p2p and the telco just makes it work, in my limited experience
where i still use frame-relay

--
Garry L. Baker
"There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Ok so Cisco says that inverse arp requires LMI to be on so it knows
> what DLCIs to map.
> However coming back to my question. Inverse-ARP still functions if LMI
> is off, just as long as the "frame-relay interface-dlci" command is
> configured.
> What I was doing wrong was that I had not disabled LMI on the FR
> Switch so the interfaces were down.
> When I disabled LMI on Switch the interfaces came up and Inverse-ARP works
> fine:
>
> interface Serial1/0
>  ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
>  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
>  no keepalive
>  serial restart-delay 0
>  frame-relay interface-dlci 102
>
> *Oct 17 16:46:55.615: Serial1/0(o): dlci 102(0x1861), pkt encaps
> 0x0300 0x8000 0x0000 0x806 (ARP), datagramsize 30
> *Oct 17 16:46:55.619: FR: Sending INARP Request on interface Serial1/0
> dlci 102 for link 7(IP)
> *Oct 17 16:46:55.659: broadcast dequeue
> *Oct 17 16:46:55.659: Serial1/0(o):Pkt sent on dlci 102(0x1861), pkt
> encaps 0x300  0x8000 0x0    0x806 (ARP), datagramsize 30
> *Oct 17 16:46:55.751: Serial1/0(i): dlci 102(0x1861), pkt encaps
> 0x0300 0x8000 0x0000 0x806 (ARP), datagramsize 30
> *Oct 17 16:46:55.751: Serial1/0: frame relay INARP received
>
> R0#sh frame-relay map
> Serial1/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.2 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic,
>              broadcast,
>              IETF
>
> I know this is not normal behaviour but I just wanted to know if
> inverse-arp is dependent on LMI and this shows that it isnt.
>
> Thanks
>
> On 17 October 2010 15:16,  <mikhail.detochkin_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk237/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a008009457a.shtml
> >
> > Q. Can Frame Relay Inverse Address Resolution Protocol (IARP) work
> without
> > Local Management Interface (LMI)?
> >
> >
> > A. No. It uses LMI to determine which permanent virtual circuits (PVCs)
> to
> > map.
> >
> >
> > On Oct 17, 2010 5:58pm, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> When I have the following config I have no problems with connectivity
> >>
> >> and I can see inverse-arp requests and replies:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> interface Serial1/0
> >>
> >>  ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> >>
> >>  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> >>
> >>  serial restart-delay 0
> >>
> >>  frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> >>
> >> end
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> However when I switch off LMI on the interface (below) I can only see
> >>
> >> inverse-arp requests but no replies and so ping fails. Is inverse-arp
> >>
> >> dependent on LMI?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> interface Serial1/0
> >>
> >>  ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> >>
> >>  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> >>
> >> no keepalive
> >>
> >>  serial restart-delay 0
> >>
> >>  frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> >>
> >> end
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Oct 17 2010 - 10:58:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART