Re: OT: 3750X stacking question

Stack master is not the same thing as switch configuration. So switch 3
can be the master. It really doesn't matter. Just keep that in mind.

--Hammer--

On 8/12/2010 3:06 PM, Salah ElShekeil wrote:
> I would make the top one as the master,
>
> because it will be easy for u to identify the physical port in the stack :-)
>
> just my 2 cents :-)
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Michael Seonarain<mseonarain_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Usama,
>>
>> I don't think it really matters but for management and configuration wise,
>> it might be helpful to use the top two for Stack Master(s) as they are
>> easily accessible for stack identification, if you're labeling the switches
>> with hostnames and IPs.
>>
>> MS
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Usama Pervaiz<chaudri_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if anyone knew what the best position for the stack
>>> master is in the stack. Our average stack will be 5 to 6 deep and the
>>> top and bottom switch will be up linked to distribution. Would it make
>>> sense to make the top one master with the highest priority and the
>>> bottom switch with the 2nd highest so it becomes master if the master
>>> goes down, or does this at all matter in any way?
>>>
>>> Your input in this will be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 12 2010 - 15:21:58 ART