Re: OT: 3750X stacking question

I would make the top one as the master,

because it will be easy for u to identify the physical port in the stack :-)

just my 2 cents :-)

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Michael Seonarain <mseonarain_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Usama,
>
> I don't think it really matters but for management and configuration wise,
> it might be helpful to use the top two for Stack Master(s) as they are
> easily accessible for stack identification, if you're labeling the switches
> with hostnames and IPs.
>
> MS
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Usama Pervaiz <chaudri_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone knew what the best position for the stack
> > master is in the stack. Our average stack will be 5 to 6 deep and the
> > top and bottom switch will be up linked to distribution. Would it make
> > sense to make the top one master with the highest priority and the
> > bottom switch with the 2nd highest so it becomes master if the master
> > goes down, or does this at all matter in any way?
> >
> > Your input in this will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Salah
CCIE #24207
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net