Usama,
I don't think it really matters but for management and configuration wise,
it might be helpful to use the top two for Stack Master(s) as they are
easily accessible for stack identification, if you're labeling the switches
with hostnames and IPs.
MS
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Usama Pervaiz <chaudri_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone knew what the best position for the stack
> master is in the stack. Our average stack will be 5 to 6 deep and the
> top and bottom switch will be up linked to distribution. Would it make
> sense to make the top one master with the highest priority and the
> bottom switch with the 2nd highest so it becomes master if the master
> goes down, or does this at all matter in any way?
>
> Your input in this will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Aug 12 2010 - 15:59:42 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART