Re: MPLS TE With PBR

Is this scenario possilbe

or not

if yes please provide me the guidance and the source where can i find
information or documentation

http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Prakash Kalsaria <
kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> R2 loopback 100.2.2.2
> R1 loopback 100.1.1.1
>
> For 100.2.2.2.2 {Lo of r2}
>
> R2# sh ip cef detail | in 100.2.2.2
> 100.2.2.2/32, version 16, epoch 0, connected, receive
> on R1
> sh ip cef detail 100.2.2.2
> its not on the table
>
> *do i have to configure a explicit path or not *
> *????*
>
> R2#sh ip route 100.2.2.2
> Routing entry for 100.2.2.2/32
> Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * directly connected, via Loopback1
> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
>
>> If you are seeing it in your label table though the OTHER side has it in
>> its routing table and is generating a lab (17 from Fa0/1) here. I thought
>> by your original message that it would be further away and nobody in between
>> had information for it.
>>
>> So on your local router, what does "show ip route 100.2.2.2" show? or
>> "show ip cef detail" for that route?
>>
>> You appear to have an explicit path set as well which has multiple hops,
>> so something is allowing you to access it already to set the tunnel up.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Prakash Kalsaria wrote:
>>
>> If i dont have that loopback in my routing table , no where
>> how do i get my tuneel UP UP , where in here this case i have my tunnel up
>>
>> crazzy things going on
>>
>>
>> R2#sh ip int bri
>> Interface IP-Address OK? Method
>> Status Protocol
>> FastEthernet0/0 12.12.12.2 YES NVRAM
>> up up
>> FastEthernet0/1 23.23.23.2 YES NVRAM
>> up up
>> Loopback0 2.2.2.2 YES NVRAM
>> up up
>> Loopback1 100.2.2.2 YES NVRAM
>> up up
>> *Tunnel12 100.2.2.2 YES TFTP
>> up up *
>> **
>> R2#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels
>> *Name: R2_t12* (Tunnel12) Destination:
>> 100.1.1.1
>> Status:
>> *Admin: up Oper: up Path: valid* Signalling:
>> connected
>> path option 1, type explicit 12 (Basis for Setup, path weight 20)
>> Config Parameters:
>> Bandwidth: 0 kbps (Global) Priority: 7 7 Affinity:
>> 0x0/0xFFFF
>> Metric Type: TE (default)
>> AutoRoute: disabled LockDown: disabled Loadshare: 0 bw-based
>> auto-bw: disabled
>> InLabel : -
>> OutLabel : FastEthernet0/1, 17
>> RSVP Signalling Info:
>> Src 100.2.2.2, Dst 100.1.1.1, Tun_Id 12, Tun_Instance 11
>> RSVP Path Info:
>> My Address: 23.23.23.2
>> Explicit Route: 23.23.23.3 13.13.13.3 13.13.13.1 100.1.1.1
>> Record Route: NONE
>> Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
>> RSVP Resv Info:
>> Record Route: NONE
>> Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
>> History:
>> Tunnel:
>> Time since created: 12 minutes, 4 seconds
>> Time since path change: 10 minutes, 58 seconds
>> Current LSP:
>> Uptime: 10 minutes, 58 seconds
>> *LSP Tunnel R1_t12 is signalled, connection is up
>> InLabel : FastEthernet0/1, implicit-null
>> OutLabel : -
>> * RSVP Signalling Info:
>> Src 100.1.1.1, Dst 100.2.2.2, Tun_Id 12, Tun_Instance 13
>> RSVP Path Info:
>> My Address: 100.2.2.2
>> Explicit Route: NONE
>> Record Route: NONE
>> Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
>> RSVP Resv Info:
>> Record Route: NONE
>> Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
>>
>>
>> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>>
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Prakash Kalsaria <
>> kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well in this case loopbacks is not in routing table
>>> R1#sh ip cef 100.1.1.1
>>> 100.1.1.1/32, version 16, epoch 0, connected, receive
>>> tag information set
>>> local tag: implicit-null
>>>
>>> loopback is not in label table and no in routing table
>>> so how should i work around to get this functionall
>>>
>>> crazy scenario
>>>
>>> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Once you HAVE your TE tunnel, you can use PBR in order to direct traffic
>>>> to it.
>>>>
>>>> but if the loopback doesn't exist in the routing/CEF table/label table,
>>>> you cannot use PBR in order to actually build a TE tunnel to begin with.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How can we perform A MPLS TE with PBR
>>>> a tunnel to establish through loopback which is not advertised in IGP and not
>>>> even static is configured
>>>>
>>>> is it possible though PBR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _____________________________________________________
>>>> Prakash Kalsaria
>>>> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 19:57:28 ART