Re: MPLS TE With PBR

R2 loopback 100.2.2.2
R1 loopback 100.1.1.1

For 100.2.2.2.2 {Lo of r2}

R2# sh ip cef detail | in 100.2.2.2
100.2.2.2/32, version 16, epoch 0, connected, receive
on R1
sh ip cef detail 100.2.2.2
its not on the table

*do i have to configure a explicit path or not *
*????*

R2#sh ip route 100.2.2.2
Routing entry for 100.2.2.2/32
  Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface)
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * directly connected, via Loopback1
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:

> If you are seeing it in your label table though the OTHER side has it in
> its routing table and is generating a lab (17 from Fa0/1) here. I thought
> by your original message that it would be further away and nobody in between
> had information for it.
>
> So on your local router, what does "show ip route 100.2.2.2" show? or
> "show ip cef detail" for that route?
>
> You appear to have an explicit path set as well which has multiple hops, so
> something is allowing you to access it already to set the tunnel up.
>
>
>
>
> Prakash Kalsaria wrote:
>
> If i dont have that loopback in my routing table , no where
> how do i get my tuneel UP UP , where in here this case i have my tunnel up
> crazzy things going on
>
>
> R2#sh ip int bri
> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> Protocol
> FastEthernet0/0 12.12.12.2 YES NVRAM up
> up
> FastEthernet0/1 23.23.23.2 YES NVRAM up
> up
> Loopback0 2.2.2.2 YES NVRAM up
> up
> Loopback1 100.2.2.2 YES NVRAM up
> up
> *Tunnel12 100.2.2.2 YES TFTP
> up up *
> **
> R2#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels
> *Name: R2_t12* (Tunnel12) Destination:
> 100.1.1.1
> Status:
> *Admin: up Oper: up Path: valid* Signalling:
> connected
> path option 1, type explicit 12 (Basis for Setup, path weight 20)
> Config Parameters:
> Bandwidth: 0 kbps (Global) Priority: 7 7 Affinity:
> 0x0/0xFFFF
> Metric Type: TE (default)
> AutoRoute: disabled LockDown: disabled Loadshare: 0 bw-based
> auto-bw: disabled
> InLabel : -
> OutLabel : FastEthernet0/1, 17
> RSVP Signalling Info:
> Src 100.2.2.2, Dst 100.1.1.1, Tun_Id 12, Tun_Instance 11
> RSVP Path Info:
> My Address: 23.23.23.2
> Explicit Route: 23.23.23.3 13.13.13.3 13.13.13.1 100.1.1.1
> Record Route: NONE
> Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
> RSVP Resv Info:
> Record Route: NONE
> Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
> History:
> Tunnel:
> Time since created: 12 minutes, 4 seconds
> Time since path change: 10 minutes, 58 seconds
> Current LSP:
> Uptime: 10 minutes, 58 seconds
> *LSP Tunnel R1_t12 is signalled, connection is up
> InLabel : FastEthernet0/1, implicit-null
> OutLabel : -
> * RSVP Signalling Info:
> Src 100.1.1.1, Dst 100.2.2.2, Tun_Id 12, Tun_Instance 13
> RSVP Path Info:
> My Address: 100.2.2.2
> Explicit Route: NONE
> Record Route: NONE
> Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
> RSVP Resv Info:
> Record Route: NONE
> Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
>
>
> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Prakash Kalsaria <
> kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well in this case loopbacks is not in routing table
>> R1#sh ip cef 100.1.1.1
>> 100.1.1.1/32, version 16, epoch 0, connected, receive
>> tag information set
>> local tag: implicit-null
>>
>> loopback is not in label table and no in routing table
>> so how should i work around to get this functionall
>>
>> crazy scenario
>>
>> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Once you HAVE your TE tunnel, you can use PBR in order to direct traffic
>>> to it.
>>>
>>> but if the loopback doesn't exist in the routing/CEF table/label table,
>>> you cannot use PBR in order to actually build a TE tunnel to begin with.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> How can we perform A MPLS TE with PBR
>>> a tunnel to establish through loopback which is not advertised in IGP and not
>>> even static is configured
>>>
>>> is it possible though PBR
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _____________________________________________________
>>> Prakash Kalsaria
>>> http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 19:52:37 ART