If you are seeing it in your label table though the OTHER side has it in
its routing table and is generating a lab (17 from Fa0/1) here. I
thought by your original message that it would be further away and nobody
in between had information for it.
So on your local router, what does "show ip route 100.2.2.2" show? or
"show ip cef detail" for that route?
You appear to have an explicit path set as well which has multiple hops,
so something is allowing you to access it already to set the tunnel up.
Prakash Kalsaria wrote:
If i dont have that loopback in my routing table , no where how do i
get my tuneel UP UP , where in here this case i have my tunnel up
crazzy things going on R2#sh ip int bri
Interface IP-Address OK? Method
Status Protocol
FastEthernet0/0 12.12.12.2 YES NVRAM
up up
FastEthernet0/1 23.23.23.2 YES NVRAM
up up
Loopback0 2.2.2.2 YES NVRAM
up up
Loopback1 100.2.2.2 YES NVRAM
up up
Tunnel12 100.2.2.2 YES TFTP
up up R2#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels Name:
R2_t12 (Tunnel12) Destination: 100.1.1.1
Status:
Admin: up Oper: up Path: valid Signalling: connected path
option 1, type explicit 12 (Basis for Setup, path weight 20) Config
Parameters:
Bandwidth: 0 kbps (Global) Priority: 7 7 Affinity:
0x0/0xFFFF
Metric Type: TE (default)
AutoRoute: disabled LockDown: disabled Loadshare: 0
bw-based
auto-bw: disabled InLabel : -
OutLabel : FastEthernet0/1, 17
RSVP Signalling Info:
Src 100.2.2.2, Dst 100.1.1.1, Tun_Id 12, Tun_Instance 11
RSVP Path Info:
My Address: 23.23.23.2
Explicit Route: 23.23.23.3 13.13.13.3 13.13.13.1 100.1.1.1
Record Route: NONE
Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
RSVP Resv Info:
Record Route: NONE
Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
History:
Tunnel:
Time since created: 12 minutes, 4 seconds
Time since path change: 10 minutes, 58 seconds
Current LSP:
Uptime: 10 minutes, 58 secondsLSP Tunnel R1_t12 is signalled,
connection is up
InLabel : FastEthernet0/1, implicit-null
OutLabel : -
RSVP Signalling Info:
Src 100.1.1.1, Dst 100.2.2.2, Tun_Id 12, Tun_Instance 13
RSVP Path Info:
My Address: 100.2.2.2
Explicit Route: NONE
Record Route: NONE
Tspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
RSVP Resv Info:
Record Route: NONE
Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits
http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Prakash Kalsaria <kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
Well in this case loopbacks is not in routing table
R1#sh ip cef 100.1.1.1
100.1.1.1/32, version 16, epoch 0, connected, receive
tag information set
local tag: implicit-null loopback is not in label table and no
in routing table
so how should i work around to get this functionall crazy
scenario http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com>
wrote:
Once you HAVE your TE tunnel, you can use PBR in order to
direct traffic to it.
but if the loopback doesn't exist in the routing/CEF
table/label table, you cannot use PBR in order to actually
build a TE tunnel to begin with.
HTH,
Scott
kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com wrote:
How can we perform A MPLS TE with PBR
a tunnel to establish through loopback which is not advertised in IGP and not
even static is configured
is it possible though PBR
_____________________________________________________
Prakash Kalsaria
http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 10:15:59 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART