(area 0) ---- R1*---------*(area 10)--------R4----(area 104)
|
R6
Hi All -
in this sutuation R1, R6 and R4 are all on the same switch and in the same
area 10. They are all configured with point-to-multipoint. The switchports
for R1 and R4 are configured with "switchport protected." Since area 104
lys on the other side of R4 a virutal link is required through area 10.
A debug on R1 showed that it was only getting hellos from R6.
R1#
*May 24 14:04:36.612: OSPF: Rcv hello from 172.16.106.1 area 10 from
FastEthernet0/1 172.16.10.6
*May 24 14:04:36.612: OSPF: End of hello processing
R1#
*May 24 14:04:56.484: OSPF: Send hello to 224.0.0.5 area 10 on
FastEthernet0/1 from 172.16.10.1
R1#
*May 24 14:05:05.736: OSPF: Rcv hello from 172.16.106.1 area 10 from
FastEthernet0/1 172.16.10.6
*May 24 14:05:05.736: OSPF: End of hello processing
When I did a show ip os neigh on R1 and R4 they both only have R6 as
neighbors.
R1(config-router)#do s ip os neig
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
172.16.102.1 0 FULL/ - 00:00:38 172.16.21.2
FastEthernet0/0
172.16.104.1 0 FULL/ - - 172.16.10.4 *OSPF_VL0*
172.16.106.1 0 FULL/ - 00:01:34 172.16.10.6
FastEthernet0/1
In the mean time both R4 and R1 have virtual links configured directly to
each other and the virtual link's adjacency state is full?
So - how is it that? Is the virtual link being routed via R6. It would
have to be.
R1#sho ip os virtual
Virtual Link OSPF_VL0 to router 172.16.104.1 is up
Run as demand circuit
DoNotAge LSA allowed.
Transit area 10, via interface FastEthernet0/1, Cost of using 2
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
Hello due in 00:00:08
Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed)
Index 2/3, retransmission queue length 0, number of retransmission 0
First 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last retransmission scan length is 0, maximum is 0
Last retransmission scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
Message digest authentication enabled
Youngest key id is 1
So in the end I have a question about the best practice for virtual links.
On a multiaccess network as in area 10, if there are no other elements like
ports are protected and we are dealing with a plain old vanilla area 10 and
needs to be a transit for a VL where should the end points be?
Should the VL go from R1-R6 and R6 to R4? or just R1-R4?
I've seen scenarios where the vl went from r1-r6 and r6-r4. But I can only
think that that would be needed if R6 was an ABR as well.
Thoughts?
r/
LG
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 10:11:35 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART