Re: Sham links between different ospf areas

From: Praveen chiguru <chiguru.praveen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 12:38:03 +0530

Hi Hussam,

Virtual link is not required here. In this scenario, It can carry as
LSA 3 type....However, you can influence sham-link over backup link
using cost parameter. I believe, it does work smooth.

Experts, Pls comment if I am wrong.

Regards,
Praveen.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Hussam EL Kebbi
<hussamkibbi_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Experts,
> I was wondering if we have Sham links (MPLSVPN) between PEs while CEs have
> different(non-area0) OSPF areas,say area 1 and area 2. Which LSA type 1 will
> be distributed between PEs and will we have discontinues OSPFareas, so we need
> to do virtual links or so? please explain.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
> inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL
> :en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not
sure about the the universe.
--Albert Einstein
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 15 2010 - 12:38:03 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:53 ART