Seen this on 10K ESR 12.2(33)SB, 12K GSR on 12.0(32)SY8 in VRFs. I
reckon the same line of reasoning for implementation came into play as
you described, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the
implementation is consistent across all code (and most certainly not
consistent across routing instances as this is generally not present
in the global routing tables).
The AD is the same as connected. The designation as local versus
something else is (guessing here) done to prevent confusion as to why
it is in the routing table.
--WM
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:
> Have you been playing with JUNOS lately? :)
>
> Anyway, keep in mind that most-specific routing always wins. It's a way
> of making sure that nobody else injects a route in that may mess up your
> reachability. Even if you have a "C"onnected route on an interface
> (AD=0), learning a more-specific route (/32 or whatever) will take
> precedence over that. And Cisco's "thinking" never accounts for the
> actual directly-attached IP address but rather sees it as part of the
> larger group.
>
> HTH,
>
> Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> evil_at_ine.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
> CCIE wrote:
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> What would the result of inserting an L (local routes) in the local table.
>
> L 10.2.3.3/32 . f0/0
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 11 2010 - 09:22:33 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART