Re: L code routes

Yes, same as connected.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruhann <groupstudy_at_ru.co.za>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:27:16
To: <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Antonio Soares<amsoares_at_netcabo.pt>; Scott Morris<smorris_at_ine.com>; CCIE<ccie_at_axizo.com>; groupstudy<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: L code routes

What is the AD associated with 'L' routes on the new(older) code?
Same as connected routes?

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:58 PM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I saw this first with asr's, 12.2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Antonio Soares" <amsoares_at_netcabo.pt>
> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:03
> To: 'Scott Morris'<smorris_at_ine.com>; 'CCIE'<ccie_at_axizo.com>
> Cc: 'groupstudy'<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: RE: L code routes
>
> This is new with 15.0 i believe:
>
> 15.0:
>
> router#sh ip route
> Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
> route
> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route
>
> 12.4T
>
> router#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static
> route
> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP)
> amsoares_at_netcabo.pt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Scott Morris
> Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de Fevereiro de 2010 13:19
> To: CCIE
> Cc: 'groupstudy'
> Subject: Re: L code routes
>
>
> Have you been playing with JUNOS lately? :)
>
> Anyway, keep in mind that most-specific routing always wins. It's a way
> of making sure that nobody else injects a route in that may mess up your
> reachability. Even if you have a "C"onnected route on an interface
> (AD=0), learning a more-specific route (/32 or whatever) will take
> precedence over that. And Cisco's "thinking" never accounts for the
> actual directly-attached IP address but rather sees it as part of the
> larger group.
>
> HTH,
>
> Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> evil_at_ine.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
> CCIE wrote:
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> What would the result of inserting an L (local routes) in the local table.
>
> L 10.2.3.3/32 . f0/0
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
<ruhann>
blog.ru.co.za
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net