RE: FR Interworking - is back to back Frame-relay mandatory?

From: Shaughn Smith <shaughn.s_at_cvnnet.co.za>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:28:45 +0200

It worked for me in GNS with the supplied Dynagen FR Switch

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bryan Bartik
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 1:12 AM
To: sp-ie m
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: FR Interworking - is back to back Frame-relay mandatory?

You can use a switch. Post your config and let's look at it...assuming
you
haven't run into a bug/unsupported feature :)

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:07 PM, sp-ie m <sp.ccie.me_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> hi guys,
>
> for AToM and L2TPv3, is back to back Frame-relay mandatory? i'm
testing
> this
> in Dynamips. FR-VLAN Interworking works fine when Back to Back FR is
used
> between CE-PE, but when i connect a dynagen frame-relay switch in the
> topology between CE-PE, the connectivity fails. So can it be made to
work
> without back-to-back FR using a dynagen FR switch?
>
> cheers
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Mon Jan 25 2010 - 09:28:45 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:42 ART