Re: FR Interworking - is back to back Frame-relay mandatory?

Shaughn can you pls. unicast me the GNS NET file and the config files. thnx.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Shaughn Smith <shaughn.s_at_cvnnet.co.za>wrote:

> It worked for me in GNS with the supplied Dynagen FR Switch
>
> CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Bryan Bartik
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 1:12 AM
> To: sp-ie m
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: FR Interworking - is back to back Frame-relay mandatory?
>
> You can use a switch. Post your config and let's look at it...assuming
> you
> haven't run into a bug/unsupported feature :)
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:07 PM, sp-ie m <sp.ccie.me_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hi guys,
> >
> > for AToM and L2TPv3, is back to back Frame-relay mandatory? i'm
> testing
> > this
> > in Dynamips. FR-VLAN Interworking works fine when Back to Back FR is
> used
> > between CE-PE, but when i connect a dynagen frame-relay switch in the
> > topology between CE-PE, the connectivity fails. So can it be made to
> work
> > without back-to-back FR using a dynagen FR switch?
> >
> > cheers
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jan 25 2010 - 13:00:34 ART