Agreed. I don't think it's impAssable based on the little feedback we have
so far. I don't plan on rushing in until I hear something positive out of
someone else first. But so far, I'm hearing that candidates need to rethink
their approach in terms of focus areas and strategy. Nothing more...
Charles Henson
From: "Joe Astorino" <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
To: "jose manzano" <josermanzano_at_gmail.com>, "CCIE Groupstudy" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Date: 11/02/2009 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: CCIE R and S ver 4
Guys if you think it is impossible and quit they have successfully weeded
you out. Many have said they failed but it was passable if you know the bp.
My 2 cents
Regards,
Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Cell: +1.586.212.6107
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: jose manzano <josermanzano_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:32:17
To: groupstudy<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: CCIE R and S ver 4
There would be a study factor if it would be possible to pass the exam ,
but
I have yet to read of anyone passing the new v4 lab.
Cisco will modify the v4 lab if in the end they have put together a lab
exam with unrealistic & unachievable expectations.
I for one though do not like the route it's going as it's starting to
feel like all this time i've invested, and continue to invest preparing for
this one exam is in vane as it's nearly impossible to achieve now.
Then again we are only a few weeks into the new exam, so lets see how it
plays out in the next few months i guess.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Atlanta CCIE <atlantaccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Cheaters don't care about that lol
>
> On 11/2/09, Jonny English <redkidneybeans_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > what about study factor?
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Nadeem Rafi <nrafia_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> luck factor or F**K factor is prime issue of V4.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Jack <ccie.unnumbered_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >> > In consulting business, we keep asking the client what they want
until
> >> the
> >> > case is clear before we give advice.
> >> > Some people mentioned that some troubleshooting tickets are vague.
I
> >> doubt
> >> > Howard at RTP is that helpful in explaining the tickets, based on my
> two
> >> > experience in V3. Last time when I was there, Howard left early.
His
> >> > replacement/substitute was younger and much more polite, humble,
> modest,
> >> and
> >> > most of all, helpful. Thanks to the young gentleman, I was able to
> >> > clear
> >> > one sentence in a configuration question, and one requirement which
> was
> >> not
> >> > said in the entire question set. Maybe it was mentioned in the
> preface,
> >> but
> >> > I was too sick that day to search any statements outside the
> questions.
> >> > Howard could have answered, "this is basic knowledge (common
sense)"
> or
> >> > "follow what the requirement says".
> >> >
> >> > Some mentioned that some troubleshooting tickets are not specific
and
> >> need
> >> > time and luck to pin down. Time and luck are the focus of V4, in my
> >> humble
> >> > opinion based on the feedbacks.
> >> >
> >> > Jack
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Terry Vinson wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The old exam was centered around configuration, the new test is
> >> >> centered
> >> >> more around consulting.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >>
Received on Mon Nov 02 2009 - 11:52:37 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 01 2009 - 06:36:28 ART