It is innocous whenever the cisco brand police make decisions to
decertify people or companies based on their findings on social
networking sites. Anyone can say or not say anything online at any
time. Someone may pose as one person and even pose as a second person
and attack the first person in some wild effort to gain an audience. I
would think precise would be the cisco brand police naming the
perpetrators publicly and making the decertification public rather
than quietly. This would dampen the link and would have a much greater
effect rather than saying it is happening and not having a single
specific example of it having happened. Mr. Morris is probably the
most correct by stating it is a $ problem. Partners who are bringing
in $ are not likely to be punished by cisco. I agree this thread takes
up bandwidth better used for questions and answers.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Oct 19 2009 - 13:51:01 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:00 ART