Re: bgp send-label with a route-map

From: Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:21:57 -0600

This is the way it works. I think Aleksey just wants to know why. I would
like to know too! Kind of a bugger when you first start dealing with
send-label and you are destined to spend hours (unless you peak in the
solution guides) troubleshooting before you learn it!

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Marcel Lammerse <m.lammerse_at_mac.com> wrote:

> Hi Aleksey,
>
> interesting question! Could you post your route-map and bgp configuration
> for us to have a look at?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On 08/10/2009, at 03:50 , Aleksey Koltsov wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>>
>> I have a question regarding bgp send-label operation. The functionality
>> itself
>> is clear, but the only thing I can't understand is that BGP stops sending
>> labels with prefixes when I attach a route-map to a peer without "set
>> mpls-
>> label" inside that route-map.
>>
>> So why does it work w/o a route-map while requires "set mpls-label" if I
>> attach a route-map? What does the route-map affect? Does it "rewrite" NLRI
>> or
>> what?
>>
>> Thank you for answering me.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 08 2009 - 15:21:57 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:50:59 ART