Re: Etherchannel problem...

From: K <ccie_at_mail.thekamels.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:49:23 -0400

Look at the configuration of interface Po1 and see if its access also.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
Reply-To: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:26:41 -0400

>Just labbed it, all worked well in my lab. I tried it with LACP and PAGP.
>
>Although ... when would you have an access link to another switch? Maybe I
>am not thinking outside the box enough ... ;-)
>
>I was able to recreate your issue (temporarily) when I had configured only
>one side for access mode and not the other. After I sync'ed the configs, I
>then did a shut and no shut and all worked fine after wards.
>
>Can you default the interfaces and then try the configs again? Normally
>when etherchannel fails there is something in the logging messages to
>indicate what the problem currently is ...
>
>HTH,
>
>Andrew Lee LIssitz
>
>
>
>On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Naufal Jamal <naufalccie_at_yahoo.in> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> SW1 and SW3 are connected through fa0/19 and fa0/20
>> the config on fa0/19 and fa0/20:
>> interface FastEthernet0/19
>> switchport access vlan 13
>> switchport mode access
>> channel-group 1 mode active
>> end
>> SW1(config-if)#do sh run int fa0/20
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 114 bytes
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/20
>> switchport access vlan 13
>> switchport mode access
>> channel-group 1 mode active
>> end
>> SW1(config-if)#do sh ether sum
>> Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
>> I - stand-alone s - suspended
>> H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
>> R - Layer3 S - Layer2
>> U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator
>> u - unsuitable for bundling
>> w - waiting to be aggregated
>> d - default port
>>
>> Number of channel-groups in use: 1
>> Number of aggregators: 1
>> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
>> ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------
>> 1 Po1(SD) LACP Fa0/19(I) Fa0/20(I)
>>
>> SW3
>> SW3(config-if)#do sh ether sum
>> Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
>> I - stand-alone s - suspended
>> H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
>> R - Layer3 S - Layer2
>> U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator
>> u - unsuitable for bundling
>> w - waiting to be aggregated
>> d - default port
>>
>> Number of channel-groups in use: 1
>> Number of aggregators: 1
>> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
>> ------+-------------+-----------+---------------------------------
>> 1 Po1(SU) LACP Fa0/19(w) Fa0/20(w)
>> SW3(config-if)#do sh run int fa0/19
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 115 bytes
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/19
>> switchport access vlan 13
>> switchport mode access
>> channel-group 1 mode passive
>> end
>> SW3(config-if)#do sh run int fa0/20
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 115 bytes
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/20
>> switchport access vlan 13
>> switchport mode access
>> channel-group 1 mode passive
>> end
>> The etherchannl is not comin up.
>> i first shut down the inter face and did the config and did no shut.no joy
>> changed the port-channel number.no joy
>> did default interface on both the routers and started from scratch.no joy.
>> Any idea how to nail this?
>> Nuafal
>>
>>
>> Try the new Yahoo! India Homepage. Click here.
>> http://in.yahoo.com/trynew
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Andrew Lee Lissitz
>all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
 
Received on Mon Sep 21 2009 - 18:49:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:04 ART