Re: Full reachability in the Real Lab

The below email was not intended for the group qand for just Scott and oops
I made a mistake sending to the group

Sorry ,if possible kindly ignore it

Thanks

Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:

> Thanks William
>
> Regards
> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:23 AM, William McCall <
> william.mccall_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No, it is not always a requirement.
>>
>> Same as reloading routers - not always a good thing.
>>
>> You will be told what has to reach what. Meet the requirements as they
>> are laid out and you get the points.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Anantha Subramanian
>> Natarajan<anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > If the answer is not Violating NDA,kindly let me know your comments.I
>> have
>> > heard much emphasis about full reachability in the real lab.Is full
>> > reachability is always a requirement or do I have to assume even
>> otherwise
>> > asked for to get full reachability or it should be a question for the
>> > proctor.Kindly let me know.
>> >
>> > Thanks for the help
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William McCall, CCIE #25044

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 07 2009 - 11:25:04 ART