Is it necessary to filter 224.0.1.39 and .40 when configuring a sink RP? I
came across this in a practice lab and didn't do this, but my RP mapping
(using auto-rp) still showed up okay:
R1#sh ip pim rp map
PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
Group(s) 225.0.144.1/32
RP 2.2.2.2 (?), v2v1, bidir
Info source: 2.2.2.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP
Uptime: 23:15:07, expires: 00:02:41
Group(s) 225.0.144.2/32
RP 2.2.2.2 (?), v2v1, bidir
Info source: 2.2.2.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP
Uptime: 23:15:07, expires: 00:02:45
Group(s) 225.0.144.3/32
RP 2.2.2.2 (?), v2v1, bidir
Info source: 2.2.2.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP
Uptime: 23:15:07, expires: 00:02:41
Group(s) 225.0.144.4/32
RP 2.2.2.2 (?), v2v1, bidir
Info source: 2.2.2.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP
Uptime: 23:15:07, expires: 00:02:42
Group(s): 224.0.0.0/4, Static
RP: 1.1.1.1 (?)
Thanks,
Ron Johns
Sr. Network Engineer
IT Department
CCNP, CCDP, CCSP, CISSP
AT&T WiFi Services
Office: 512-519-6255
Mobile: 936-499-7755
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Sep 06 2009 - 19:26:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART