Re: Failed Again!!!

From: Raghav Bhargava <raghavbhargava12_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:08:04 -0700

Hey Dennis,

My sympathy's with you . I failed mine this tuesday and thats why I was
frustated coz the OEQ marks said 0%. They didn't even tell whether I had any
correct ones or not..
That is really frustating...But better luck next time....

Regards
Raghav

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Someone said (Hearsay): A proctor told them if the answer was in there it
> would get points for each oeq.
>
> You can use 4-5 words but they should be the best 4-5 words.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Larry <cc13lab_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know the reasoning behind not being allowed to have another
> set
> > of eyes on these answers?? I mean there are 10 ways to verify routing
> > configurations right?? show ip protocols, show run, show ip route, show
> ip
> > xxx neigh. maybe you put 1 way that the particular person grading is not
> > aware of (i know unlikely but still possible with the wide variation in
> > these questions).
> >
> > owell... luckily i work with crypto and mpls on a regular basis...... DAM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Darby Weaver
> > Network Engineer
> >
> > 407-802-7394
> > darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Warm Regards
Raghav
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Sep 04 2009 - 09:08:04 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART