Re: Failed Again!!!

Hey mate i am sorry to hear the bad news, to me you are as good as any CCIE,
i saw your strengths in the class. DONT GIVE UP, i know you won't because
that is NOT you, but don't even think about it.
 I DO NOT AGREE with OEQs at all. If Cisco is trying to stop cheaters, they
should get the proctor to go around and ask few questions regarding the
configuration, things like...why did you configure it this way? OR have the
OEQs based on the configuration questions. I hope they change this.

I will be in London, let's chat when i come back.......

Thanks

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Someone said (Hearsay): A proctor told them if the answer was in there it
> would get points for each oeq.
>
> You can use 4-5 words but they should be the best 4-5 words.
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Larry <cc13lab_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know the reasoning behind not being allowed to have another
> set
> > of eyes on these answers?? I mean there are 10 ways to verify routing
> > configurations right?? show ip protocols, show run, show ip route, show
> ip
> > xxx neigh. maybe you put 1 way that the particular person grading is not
> > aware of (i know unlikely but still possible with the wide variation in
> > these questions).
> >
> > owell... luckily i work with crypto and mpls on a regular basis...... DAM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Darby Weaver
> > Network Engineer
> >
> > 407-802-7394
> > darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net