Re: Version 4 Question

From: Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:27:34 -0400

To me: Static RP

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:06 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> That is how I read it ...
>
> Makes sense, the other two methods use mcast signaling or groups to
> distribute RP info ...
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Nathan Richie <nathanr_at_boice.net> wrote:
>
> > Under Section 5 of the R&S version 4 lab blueprint, it reads:
> >
> > 5.40 - Implement PIM Auto-Rendezvous Point (Auto-RP), unicast rendezvous
> > point (RP), and bootstrap router (BSR)
> >
> > Does the unicast rendezvous point (RP) refer to static RP or is this
> > another misprint and should be unicast RPF or Anycast RP? (By misprint,
> I
> > am referring to the "1.10(C) - 801.1s " for STP.
> >
> > Just trying to clarify.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Aug 23 2009 - 18:27:34 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART